It's 3 AM and you're staring at three different Excel files: Wind_Farm_Analysis_v2.xlsx
, Wind_Farm_Analysis_FINAL.xlsx
, and Wind_Farm_Analysis_FINAL_APPROVED_USE_THIS.xlsx
. The investment committee meeting is in 6 hours, and you have no idea which assumptions are current.
Sound familiar? You're not alone. According to a 2023 EY survey, 73% of energy companies report "significant challenges with scenario consistency" across their investment process. The culprit? Ungoverned spreadsheet chaos.
This article explains how data contracts and scenario pack versioning can transform your investment process from Excel archaeology to confident, reproducible decisions.
The Spreadsheet Problem: A $100M Miscommunication
In 2019, a major European utility almost green-lit a €100M battery storage project based on outdated power price assumptions. The Excel model used Q2 price forecasts while the market had shifted dramatically in Q3. Only a last-minute audit caught the error.
The root cause wasn't human error—it was systemic lack of scenario governance:
- Version confusion: Multiple Excel files with similar names
- Assumption drift: No clear change tracking for key parameters
- Review chaos: Email chains with conflicting "final" versions
- Audit nightmares: No clear lineage from input to output
"We had investment memos based on three different LCOE assumptions—and nobody knew which one was approved by the committee." — CFO, 2GW Renewable Portfolio
What Are Data Contracts?
A data contract is like a software API, but for financial assumptions. It defines:
- Schema: What parameters must be present (power price, WACC, etc.)
- Types: Data formats and validation rules
- Governance: Who can approve changes and when
- Lineage: Complete audit trail from source to calculation
Instead of hunting through Excel cells, you get a structured, versioned interface:
Parameter | Current Value | Source | Last Modified | Approved By |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Price (€/MWh) | 45.50 | Market Analysis Q4 | 2024-11-15 | J. Schmidt |
WACC (%) | 7.2 | Treasury Update | 2024-11-10 | M. Weber |
Capacity Factor (%) | 38.5 | Wind Resource Study | 2024-10-22 | T. Mueller |
Three Types of Data Contracts
Market Data
Power prices, carbon prices, fuel costs—external market assumptions with clear sources and update frequencies.
Technical Parameters
Equipment specs, capacity factors, O&M costs—engineering assumptions with validation against manufacturer data.
Financial Assumptions
WACC, tax rates, depreciation—corporate finance parameters typically set by treasury or CFO office.
Scenario Pack Lifecycle: Draft → Review → Frozen
Think of a scenario pack as a complete set of assumptions for a specific investment decision. Each pack follows a controlled lifecycle:
1. Draft Stage
Analysts build and modify scenarios freely. All changes are tracked, but the pack remains flexible for exploration and refinement.
2. Review Stage
Pack is locked for stakeholder review. Comments and feedback are captured, but no direct edits allowed. This prevents the "I thought we agreed on..." problem.
3. Frozen Stage
Investment committee approves the pack. All parameters become read-only with complete audit trail. Any future changes require a new pack version.
Real Example: Offshore Wind Project
Scenario Pack v2.1 (Approved Dec 1, 2024)
Base case assumptions for 400MW offshore wind farm
15 parameters • 3 approval signatures • 100% audit coverage
Key Changes from v2.0:
• Power price forecast: €42/MWh → €45.50/MWh (+8.3%)
• Capacity factor: 37.2% → 38.5% (+1.3pp)
• WACC: 7.5% → 7.2% (-30bp)
Audit Requirements: What Banks Actually Check
When preparing project finance documentation, lenders focus on four key governance areas:
1. Assumption Traceability
- Can you trace every input back to its source?
- Who approved each assumption and when?
- What's the update frequency for market-dependent parameters?
2. Scenario Consistency
- Do all models use identical base case assumptions?
- How are scenario variations documented and approved?
- Can you reproduce results from archived scenario packs?
3. Change Management
- What triggers assumption updates?
- Who has authority to modify frozen scenarios?
- How are material changes communicated to stakeholders?
4. Version Control
- Complete history of all scenario pack versions
- Diff reports showing parameter changes between versions
- Ability to rollback to previous approved states
"The ability to export complete audit trails cut our due diligence time by 40%. Everything was transparent and traceable." — Project Finance Director, Major European Bank
Implementation Roadmap: From Chaos to Control
Week 1-2: Assessment & Planning
- Inventory existing Excel models and assumption sources
- Identify key stakeholders and approval processes
- Define data contract schemas for your project types
Week 3-4: Pilot Implementation
- Start with one project type (e.g., solar PV)
- Create initial scenario packs with version control
- Train team on pack lifecycle (draft/review/frozen)
Week 5-8: Scale & Integrate
- Expand to additional project types
- Integrate with existing approval workflows
- Build audit export capabilities
Week 9-12: Optimize & Govern
- Establish regular scenario pack review cycles
- Create dashboard for assumption monitoring
- Train investment committee on new governance process
Quick Win: The 5-Minute Audit Export
With proper scenario governance, you can export complete audit documentation in minutes, not days. This includes:
- All scenario pack versions with approval timestamps
- Parameter change history with justifications
- Cross-project assumption consistency reports
- Stakeholder approval trails with digital signatures
Results: What Good Governance Delivers
Companies that implement scenario governance typically see:
- 50-70% reduction in investment memo preparation time
- Zero audit queries on assumption consistency
- 100% reproducibility of historical calculations
- 25-40% faster due diligence processes
But the biggest benefit is confidence. When your CFO can look at an investment decision and know exactly what assumptions drove the recommendation, you've achieved true governance.
Next Steps: Building Your Scenario Governance
Ready to eliminate spreadsheet archaeology from your investment process? Here's what to do next:
- Start small: Pick one project type and define its data contract
- Establish roles: Who can create, review, and approve scenario packs?
- Document everything: Every assumption needs a source and approval trail
- Test the audit: Can you export complete documentation in under 10 minutes?
The goal isn't perfect data—it's governed data. When everyone knows which version is current and who approved what assumptions, you can focus on making better investment decisions instead of hunting through email chains.
Because at 3 AM, you should be sleeping—not playing Excel detective.